To: U.S. Dept of Justice/US Attorney John W. Huber & USAG Loretta Lynch & Pres. Obama
Demand DOJ use filed proof of Corp. Shareholder Bribery with filed test case in SLC,UT.
Petition Text
U.S. Dept. of Justice/US Attorney John W. Huber & USAG Loretta Lynch TO GIVE THE ORDER FOR DUE PROCESS & FULL INVESTIGATION BY SLC-FBI ALONG WITH A PUBLIC STATEMENT OF FILED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST ZION'S BANK FOR THE BUYING OF INFLUENCE -VIOLATING CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/BRIBERY.
A TEST CASE IS FILED WITH THE DOJ- HAS THE EVIDENCE & GROUNDS TO PROSECUTE CORP. SHAREHOLDER BRIBERY.
https://twitter.com/CivilRights/status/652164603351203840
https://twitter.com/jonnyricola/status/653649277500035072
BEFORE YOU IS THE LEGAL GROUNDS TO PROSECUTE CORPORATIONS WITH SHAREHOLDER'S LAW IN FORCE/ THOSE LAWS DEMAND JUSTIFICATION OF SPENDING.
SO WE HAVE PROOF OF INTENT TO COMMIT BRIBERY:
"FREEDOM OF SPEECH" JUSTIFICATION HAS NO MERITS.
THIS SURVEY PROVES THAT TO BE TRUE.
JUST ASK ANY ATTORNEY OR PUBLIC OFFICIAL TO SIGN THEIR BELIEFS WITH ALL OF THE FACTS ON ONE PAGE TO REVIEW.
USE THIS GIFT OF KNOWLEDGE & ASK NEWSMEDIA TO CONFIRM.
U.S. Attorney John W. Huber & constitution defender:
Which statement is true?.........."& why didn't you write this!"
SURVEY FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS & CITIZENS ABOUT BRIBERY.
(Attorneys are officers of the court)
I am a public official under oath (Or May Become One) and must have an opinion about the use of money or promises to influence any public official in the discharge of his or her public or legal duties.
I agree that corporate political contributions are not lawful and violate state and federal bribery statutes because of:
"corporate mission laws/justification of spending"
that protect share holder's funds
(from fraud/embezzlement); funds must be spent on profit, potential profit or humanitarian expenditures only. So intent cannot be freedom of speech but seeking influence for profit.........................
Sign here:
Name(print)______________________________Sign______________________date_______
If you believe that corporate contributions (under corporate mission laws) are lawful................
Sign here:
Name(print)___________________________Sign__________________________date_______
BRIBERY: The offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting of something of value for the purpose of influencing the action of an official in the discharge of his or her public or legal duties.................unlawful by constitutional Equality Under All Laws.. (created Feb. 14, 2014)
Any Candidate Or Public Official That Cannot State Their Beliefs On Bribery: Is Not Honoring Oath Of Office/ETHICS.
Sincerely,
Jonathan L. Peterson
Behavior Research for Humanity llc.
3670 S. Red Maple Rd. Salt Lake City, UT 84106 (ph.208-650-1346) [email protected] @jonnyricola
A TEST CASE IS FILED WITH THE DOJ- HAS THE EVIDENCE & GROUNDS TO PROSECUTE CORP. SHAREHOLDER BRIBERY.
https://twitter.com/CivilRights/status/652164603351203840
https://twitter.com/jonnyricola/status/653649277500035072
BEFORE YOU IS THE LEGAL GROUNDS TO PROSECUTE CORPORATIONS WITH SHAREHOLDER'S LAW IN FORCE/ THOSE LAWS DEMAND JUSTIFICATION OF SPENDING.
SO WE HAVE PROOF OF INTENT TO COMMIT BRIBERY:
"FREEDOM OF SPEECH" JUSTIFICATION HAS NO MERITS.
THIS SURVEY PROVES THAT TO BE TRUE.
JUST ASK ANY ATTORNEY OR PUBLIC OFFICIAL TO SIGN THEIR BELIEFS WITH ALL OF THE FACTS ON ONE PAGE TO REVIEW.
USE THIS GIFT OF KNOWLEDGE & ASK NEWSMEDIA TO CONFIRM.
U.S. Attorney John W. Huber & constitution defender:
Which statement is true?.........."& why didn't you write this!"
SURVEY FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS & CITIZENS ABOUT BRIBERY.
(Attorneys are officers of the court)
I am a public official under oath (Or May Become One) and must have an opinion about the use of money or promises to influence any public official in the discharge of his or her public or legal duties.
I agree that corporate political contributions are not lawful and violate state and federal bribery statutes because of:
"corporate mission laws/justification of spending"
that protect share holder's funds
(from fraud/embezzlement); funds must be spent on profit, potential profit or humanitarian expenditures only. So intent cannot be freedom of speech but seeking influence for profit.........................
Sign here:
Name(print)______________________________Sign______________________date_______
If you believe that corporate contributions (under corporate mission laws) are lawful................
Sign here:
Name(print)___________________________Sign__________________________date_______
BRIBERY: The offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting of something of value for the purpose of influencing the action of an official in the discharge of his or her public or legal duties.................unlawful by constitutional Equality Under All Laws.. (created Feb. 14, 2014)
Any Candidate Or Public Official That Cannot State Their Beliefs On Bribery: Is Not Honoring Oath Of Office/ETHICS.
Sincerely,
Jonathan L. Peterson
Behavior Research for Humanity llc.
3670 S. Red Maple Rd. Salt Lake City, UT 84106 (ph.208-650-1346) [email protected] @jonnyricola
Why is this important?
Bribery is unlawful. It corrupts our government & society.
Bribery causes voter powers to be nullified with unjust, unfair representation in our government.
Bribery violates our highest principle of democracy/Republic rules of conduct.
CITIZENS MUST REMAIN EQUAL UNDER ALL LAWS.
Removing bribery use will repair our unlawful behaviors with fair & impartial government-
FOR THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
(not operated by the highest bidder.)
Bribery causes voter powers to be nullified with unjust, unfair representation in our government.
Bribery violates our highest principle of democracy/Republic rules of conduct.
CITIZENS MUST REMAIN EQUAL UNDER ALL LAWS.
Removing bribery use will repair our unlawful behaviors with fair & impartial government-
FOR THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
(not operated by the highest bidder.)